小程序
传感搜
传感圈

Why Does IoT Need to Be Delivered as a Managed Service?

2023-08-03 09:07:09
关注

Illustration: © IoT For All

Today, there is an increasing realization amongst IoT adopters and vendors that the various constituent elements of an IoT solution must be delivered as a managed service or series of managed services. In June 2023, Transforma Insights published a white paper in collaboration with Telit Cinterion entitled, “The Internet of Things can only be delivered as a managed service,” which looked at why enterprises should be more selective about demanding a more personalized service and picking their IoT connectivity partners. Let’s take a look at some of the key highlights in the white paper.

8 Key Highlights

#: Managed Service is the Best Way

In February 2023, Transforma Insights published its annual Communications Service Provider IoT Peer Benchmarking report, looking at the capabilities and strategies of CSPs in delivering IoT connectivity and other associated services. One notable trend, which has also been manifested in other areas of IoT, has been the greater requirement to provide more customer support, whether it be a full systems integration project, enriched post-sales support, or something in between.

It has become well-recognized that enterprises need some handholding to deploy their IoT projects. This is even more pronounced for mass market deployments in which adopters have little to no direct expertise in IoT. Simply throwing an increasingly complex array of hardware, middleware platforms, connectivity options, and cloud architectures at an enterprise and expecting them to piece together their own IoT solution is, at best, fanciful. IoT is a non-core area for almost every adopter, so some element of handholding is critical.

#2: Infinitely Scalable IoT Is Gone

One major implication of the customization requirement is that there is a diminishing opportunity for any company to exist as an infinitely scalable IoT platform. Such elements are increasingly commoditized and demanding of a service layer on top of them. Middleware companies are differentiating on vertical sector expertise, and recent years have seen some major technology vendors mothball or close their IoT platform play, including Google IoT Core and IBM Watson IoT.

IoT is a service rather than a product business; such is the necessity for customization to meet clients’ requirements. This means fewer unicorn platform companies and more service-oriented companies resolving real-world client requirements.

#3: Cross-Optimization is Critical

In August 2021, Transforma Insights published a report, “What is the ‘Thin IoT’ stack and why do I need it?” which describes an emerging norm within the development of IoT applications to make use of specific off-the-shelf technologies that have been created explicitly to be optimized for use in constrained environments, such as limited access to power, low bandwidth connectivity, and limited processing and memory.

As well as making use of these IoT-specific technologies, there is a greater requirement for all the constituent elements of an application to be optimized with each other. Technological and commercial developments mean that support for enterprises deploying IoT will be increasingly multi-disciplinary, involving the cross-optimization of many different solution elements, including devices, device management, connectivity (including multi-bearer), application enablement, cloud integration, edge computing, protocols, and application logic.

#4: Cross-Optimization Leads to Better Fault Resolution

One positive result of the increasing cross-optimization of IoT is that it will help with one of the greatest headaches of deploying IoT: fault resolution. With disparate elements that aren’t optimized together, it’s often hard to avoid a blame game between vendors in the event of faults. An optimized solution and, ideally, a single point of contact (i.e., the vendor that acts as the “optimizer”) should reduce issues and result in swifter resolution. Having one point of accountability is becoming more important, particularly when resolving faults in critically interconnected elements.

The organization responsible for ensuring the different elements of IoT applications work together is also well placed to iron out one of the main challenges of IoT: fault resolution in a multi-vendor environment, avoiding the blame game that dogs many IoT deployments.

#5: Not All Vendors Are Equal

One of the main questions that enterprise IoT adopters ask Transforma Insights is, “Which vendor should I select and why?” The answer will inevitably come down to the buyer’s specific deployment parameters and sensitivities. However, we can offer a few pointers on selecting a vendor in the newly evolved IoT taxonomy, with growing capabilities in managed services and the need for cross-optimization and bundling.

The degree of pre-sales and post-sales support is a critical differentiator between vendors. On paper, many offerings might look identical, but there is a world of difference between best-in-class and run-of-the-mill despite having the same offering. The best vendors realize that the guidance they provide is as important as the products.

#6: Context(ualizsation) is King

With the growing requirement to hold the hand of the customer as they deploy IoT and provide a richer set of pre-sales and post-sales support comes an increased verticalization of any offering. Vendors must understand the vertical into which they are selling and provide support that is contextualized for it. This doesn’t mean that the suppliers necessarily need vertical solutions themselves; moving “up the stack” is fraught with challenges. But it is in their interests to build knowledge and expertise in contextualizing horizontal offerings for the vertical they are addressing. And that’s great news for the buyer too.

There is a strong tendency amongst IoT vendors to say that they can deliver almost any functionality. Adopters should look for those with experience in their particular circumstances.

#7: Managed Connections to Exceed 70 Percent in 2023

The future of IoT vendors is in delivering expert, personalized support to enterprises based on the particulars of their deployment. Vendors will continue to use horizontal capabilities as their building blocks to gain some scale, but when interacting with enterprises, customization is key.

In total, we estimate that a little under one-third of all cellular IoT connections are truly managed today. This figure will increase significantly over the coming decade to around 73 percent in 2032.

#8: Hardware & Connectivity Bundles to Grow to 100 Million

One of the ways in which the requirement for cross-optimization is likely to manifest itself is in the increased bundling of cellular connectivity subscriptions with hardware in the form of modules and gateways. We expect such bundled offerings to more than triple between 2022 (30 million shipments) and 2025 (100 million).

About the White Paper

The White Paper starts by exploring why there is greater demand amongst IoT buyers for more managed services, and then examines the growing demand for cross-optimization of the elements of the IoT stack, before examining the reasons why hardware/connectivity bundling is on the rise. It finishes by summarizing changes in the supplier ecosystem with the emergence of a new IoT Taxonomy and identifying how all these evolutions might affect an enterprise’s decision-making process in vendor selection.

Tweet

Share

Share

Email

  • Cloud Software
  • Connectivity
  • IoT Platforms
  • Network and Protocols
  • Remote Management

  • Cloud Software
  • Connectivity
  • IoT Platforms
  • Network and Protocols
  • Remote Management

参考译文
物联网为什么需要作为托管服务来交付?
插图:© IoT For All → 今天,越来越多的物联网(IoT)采用者和供应商意识到,物联网解决方案的各个组成部分必须以托管服务或一系列托管服务的形式提供。2023年6月,Transforma Insights与Telit Cinterion合作发布了一份白皮书,题为“物联网只能以托管服务的形式交付”,探讨了企业为何应更谨慎地要求个性化服务,并选择物联网连接合作伙伴。我们来了解一下白皮书中的几个关键要点。**8个关键要点:****#1: 托管服务是最好的方式** 2023年2月,Transforma Insights发布了年度《通信服务提供商物联网同行基准报告》,研究了CSP在提供物联网连接和其他相关服务方面的能力和策略。一个显著趋势是,越来越多地要求提供更全面的客户支持,无论是一个完整的系统集成项目,还是增强的售后支持,抑或介于两者之间。企业需要某种形式的扶持才能部署它们的物联网项目。这一点在大规模市场部署中尤为明显,因为采用者在物联网方面几乎或完全没有直接的专业知识。简单地将越来越复杂的硬件、中间件平台、连接选项和云架构堆叠给企业,并期望他们自行拼凑自己的物联网解决方案,最多只是幻想。对于几乎所有的采用者来说,物联网并非核心业务,因此某种程度的扶持至关重要。**#2: 无限扩展的物联网已成过去式** 定制化需求的一个重大影响是,任何公司作为可无限扩展物联网平台的机会都在减少。这些组件正变得越来越商品化,并且需要在其之上提供服务层。中间件公司则通过垂直行业专业知识进行差异化。近年来,一些主要的技术供应商已放弃或关闭了它们的物联网平台业务,包括Google IoT Core和IBM Watson IoT。物联网是一项服务业务而非产品业务;满足客户定制化需求是必然的选择。这意味着越来越少的独角兽平台公司,而越来越多以服务为导向的公司在解决现实世界的客户需求。**#3: 跨优化至关重要** 2021年8月,Transforma Insights发布了一篇报告:“什么是‘轻量级物联网’堆栈,为什么我需要它?”,描述了在物联网应用开发中一种日益普及的规范,即使用专门为受限环境而设计的现成技术,例如电源受限、带宽低、处理能力和内存有限等。除了使用这些物联网专用技术外,还有一种日益增长的需求,即应用程序的各个组成部分之间需要相互优化。技术和商业的发展意味着,为部署物联网的企业提供的支持将越来越需要跨学科的协作,涉及对多个不同解决方案元素的跨优化,包括设备、设备管理、连接(包括多承载)、应用使能、云集成、边缘计算、协议和应用逻辑。**#4: 跨优化带来更多故障解决** 物联网日益跨优化的一个积极结果是,它将有助于解决部署物联网的最大烦恼之一:故障排查。对于那些未经过优化的组件,一旦发生故障,常常难以避免厂商之间的相互推诿。一个优化的解决方案,理想情况下,应该有一个单一的联系点(即充当“优化者”的供应商),这将减少问题并加快解决速度。拥有一个责任明确的点变得越来越重要,特别是在解决关键互联组件的故障时。负责确保物联网应用各部分协同工作的组织也最有可能解决物联网的主要挑战之一:在多供应商环境中进行故障排查,并避免多见的相互指责。**#5: 并非所有供应商都相等** 企业物联网采用者向Transforma Insights提出的主要问题之一是:“我应该选择哪家供应商,为什么?”答案不可避免地取决于买家特定的部署参数和敏感点。然而,我们也可以提供一些在新演变的物联网分类中选择供应商的指导,这需要在托管服务和跨优化及打包方面不断增长的能力。售前和售后支持的程度是供应商之间的重要区别点。表面上看,许多产品可能看起来一样,但即使提供相同的产品,最佳产品与普通产品之间也有天壤之别。优秀的供应商明白,他们提供的指导与产品一样重要。**#6: 情境化为王** 随着对客户在部署物联网过程中提供更多售前和售后服务扶持的需要日益增长,任何产品都趋于垂直化。供应商必须了解他们所销售的垂直领域,并为其提供情境化支持。这并不意味着供应商必须拥有垂直解决方案;向上发展充满挑战。但他们有利益去构建在目标垂直领域中对水平产品进行情境化的知识和专业知识。这对买家来说也是好消息。物联网供应商中存在一种强烈的倾向,声称他们可以提供几乎任何功能。采用者应寻找在特定情况下有经验的供应商。**#7: 2023年托管连接将超过70%** 物联网供应商的未来在于基于企业特定部署情况提供专业、个性化的支持。供应商将继续使用水平能力作为构建块以获得一定的规模,但在与企业互动时,定制化是关键。总体而言,我们估计今天真正被托管的蜂窝物联网连接中,略低于三分之一。未来十年内,这一数字将显著增长,预计到2032年将达到约73%。**#8: 硬件与连接捆绑将增长至1亿** 跨优化需求很可能会以蜂窝连接订阅与硬件(如模块和网关)形式捆绑的形式体现出来。我们预计,此类捆绑产品在2022年(3000万出货量)到2025年(1亿)期间将增长三倍以上。**关于白皮书** 白皮书首先探讨了为何物联网买家对更多托管服务的需求在增加,然后研究了对物联网栈元素跨优化日益增长的需求,随后分析了硬件/连接捆绑增长的原因。最后,白皮书总结了供应商生态系统的变革,随着新的物联网分类的出现,识别这些演变如何影响企业在供应商选择过程中的决策过程。TweetShareShareEmail 云软件 连接性 IoT平台 网络与协议 远程管理 → 云软件 连接性 IoT平台 网络与协议 远程管理
您觉得本篇内容如何
评分

评论

您需要登录才可以回复|注册

提交评论

广告

iotforall

这家伙很懒,什么描述也没留下

关注

点击进入下一篇

TCP四次挥手的过程与状态

提取码
复制提取码
点击跳转至百度网盘