小程序
传感搜
传感圈

How AI Overcomes the Challenges of Indoor Asset Tracking in Hospitals

2023-08-08 17:31:47
关注

Illustration: © IoT For All

In IoT applications, AI is most often employed at the “top end” of the data stack – operating on large datasets, often from multiple sources. In a hospital setting, for example, AI and RTLS might be used for predictive analytics: can you predict the rate of ER admissions based on the weather? Can you better estimate when equipment requires maintenance based on usage?

At the “bottom end” of every IoT stack, however, AI is beginning to be applied to the sensors themselves with a very important effect: AI enables low-quality sensors to achieve very high-quality performance, delivering a return on investment that’s been absent in many IoT solutions until now.

AI and RTLS

One application of AI in sensors is in real-time location systems (RTLS). AI and RTLS are employed in many industries to keep track of moving assets to better monitor, optimize and automate critical processes.

A simple example in a hospital is the management of clean equipment rooms – storage rooms spread throughout a hospital where clean equipment is staged for use. A nurse requiring a piece of equipment should be able to find exactly what they need in a clean room.

However, if the clean room stock level is not maintained correctly then equipment might not be available, forcing a lengthy search that impacts patient safety and staff productivity, ultimately forcing hospitals to over-buy expensive equipment (often double) to make sure there is an excess of availability.

If you could determine the location of equipment automatically, you could easily keep track of the number of available devices in each clean room and automatically trigger replenishment when stock runs low. This is one use of RTLS where the requirement is to determine which room a device is in. Is it in a patient room? Then it’s not available. Is it in a clean room? Then it contributes to the count of available devices.

Determining which room a device is located in with very high confidence is therefore paramount: a location error that makes you think that the three IV pumps you are looking for are in patient room 12 when in fact they are in the clean room next door would lead to a breakdown of the process by over-estimating available pumps.

With RTLS, a mobile tag is attached to the asset, and fixed infrastructure (often in the ceiling or on the walls) determines the location of the tag. Various wireless technologies are used to achieve this, and this is where AI is making a significant positive impact. The technologies used fall into one of two camps:

  1. Wireless technologies that do not penetrate walls, for example, ultrasound and infrared. Room-level accuracy is achieved by placing a receiver in each room and listening for transmitting mobile tags. If you can hear the tag, it must be in the same room as you. Room-level accuracy is achieved.

  2. Wireless technologies that do penetrate walls, for example, Wi-Fi and Bluetooth (most often Bluetooth Low Energy or BLE). Receivers are placed throughout the building and measure the signal strength of received tag transmissions to determine the location of the tags algorithmically.

Common Issues

The problems with camp #1—the non-wall penetrating technologies—are manifold. What happens when someone leaves the door open? (A common policy in most hospitals). How do you determine the location of a device when there are no walls? (Equipment is often stored in open areas).

The answer is to add more and more infrastructure devices to the already very costly requirement to place a device in every room, meaning that these solutions quickly become cost prohibitive, and very cumbersome to deploy.

Camp #2 requires a lot less infrastructure and is more appealing from a price standpoint, but there are limitations. Measuring the signal strength received from a single tag at multiple fixed receivers supports a deterministic calculation of tag location. By using generic models for how signal strength drops over distance, a rough range estimate can be made, and three range estimates yield a 2D location estimate. Geofences in software translate those 2D coordinates into room occupancy.

The trouble is that the way signals drop over the range is complex and chaotic, influenced not only by signal blockage (walls, equipment, people), but also by the interactions of multiple signal reflections (“multipath fading”). The net result is that location is determined with an accuracy of 8 to 10 meters or worse—not nearly enough to determine which room an object is in.

Machine Learning

Those with a machine-learning background may have spotted an opportunity: determining which room an object is in is not a tracking problem, but a classification problem. As with all epiphanies, it took a new generation of RTLS companies to step back from their algorithms to see the problem in a new light. It’s here that AI is transforming RTLS.

What if you could leverage the low-cost technologies of Camp #2 to achieve the same level of performance as Camp #1? What if you could deliver all the value without the cost? By leveraging BLE sensors and applying machine-learning this is exactly what AI brings to the party.

Rather than jumping through hoops to make very poor range estimates based on signal strength, why not leverage signal strength as a feature to train a classification algorithm? Since the signals penetrate multiple walls, a single tag can hear signals from several fixed infrastructure devices providing plenty of features to result in a very high confidence inference about room occupancy. The AI is trained once during installation, learning the features sufficient to distinguish Room 1 from Room 2, etc.

This is a fundamental shift in thinking with a very profound outcome. For traditional Wi-Fi and BLE systems, the chaotic signal propagation in buildings creates huge variations in signal strength, confounding range-estimation algorithms.

The result is very poor accuracy, but conversely, that same variation in signal strength from one place to another is exactly the feature variation that makes ML such a powerful tool. The signal propagation features that crush traditional approaches are the exact fodder you need to feed an AI.

RTLS has entered a new era where sophisticated machine learning algorithms running on cloud-sized brains can take a classification approach to object location. The result of AI and RTLS is high-performing, low-cost sensors that are improving critical processes and allowing hospitals to provide better service and achieve better outcomes—all at a lower cost.

Tweet

Share

Share

Email

  • Healthcare
  • Hospitals
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Asset Tracking
  • Indoor Positioning

  • Healthcare
  • Hospitals
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Asset Tracking
  • Indoor Positioning

参考译文
人工智能如何克服医院室内资产追踪的挑战
插图:© IoT For All → 在物联网应用中,人工智能(AI)通常用于数据堆栈的“高端”——处理来自多个来源的大数据集。例如在医院环境中,AI和实时定位系统(RTLS)可用于预测分析:你能根据天气预测急诊室的入院率吗?你能根据使用情况更准确地预测设备何时需要维护吗?然而,在每一个物联网堆栈的“低端”,人工智能也开始应用于传感器本身,并且带来了非常重要的效果:AI使低质量的传感器能够实现高质量的性能,从而实现此前许多物联网解决方案所缺乏的投资回报。人工智能与RTLS AI在传感器中的一个应用是实时定位系统(RTLS)。AI和RTLS被广泛用于许多行业,以追踪移动资产,从而更好地监控、优化和自动化关键流程。医院中的一个简单例子是清洁设备室的管理——这些存储室分布在医院各处,用于存放即将使用的清洁设备。护士在需要设备时,应该能够在清洁室内准确找到所需物品。然而,如果清洁室的库存没有正确管理,设备可能就不可用,迫使护士花大量时间寻找设备,从而影响患者安全和工作效率,最终迫使医院购买两倍于实际需求的昂贵设备以确保充足可用性。如果你能自动确定设备的位置,就可以轻松掌握每个清洁室内可用设备的数量,并在库存不足时自动触发补充机制。这是RTLS的一种典型应用,其需求是确定设备所在的房间。设备在患者房间吗?那它就不可用。在清洁室吗?那它就计入可用设备数量。因此,以非常高的置信度确定设备所在的房间至关重要:如果一个定位误差使你误以为所需的三台输液泵位于12号患者房间,而它们实际上就在隔壁的清洁室内,那么就会高估可用设备的数量,导致流程中断。在RTLS中,一个可移动的标签被附在资产上,固定基础设施(通常安装在天花板或墙壁上)则用于确定标签的位置。为实现这一功能,使用了各种无线技术,而人工智能正对这一领域产生积极影响。使用的无线技术可分为两类: 1. 不能穿透墙体的技术,例如超声波和红外线。通过在每个房间内安装接收器,并监听移动标签的信号,可以实现房间级的定位。如果你能听到标签的信号,它就必须和你处于同一个房间。这样就实现了房间级的精度。 2. 能穿透墙体的技术,例如Wi-Fi和蓝牙(尤其是低功耗蓝牙BLE)。在建筑中广泛布设接收器,并通过测量接收信号的强度来算法化地确定标签的位置。常见问题 第一类(不能穿透墙体的技术)面临多种问题。例如,当门被打开时会发生什么?(这是大多数医院的常见现象)。没有墙体的情况下,你如何确定设备的位置?(设备经常存放在开放区域)。答案是:在本就成本高昂的每个房间都安装设备的基础上,再增加更多基础设施设备,这使得解决方案的成本迅速上升,部署也变得极其复杂。第二类虽然基础设施需求较少,从价格角度来看更具吸引力,但也存在局限性。通过在多个固定接收器处测量来自单个标签的信号强度,可以进行确定性计算,估算标签的位置。通过使用通用模型来计算信号强度随距离下降的情况,可以得到一个大致的范围估计,三个范围估计值可得出一个二维位置估计。软件中的地理围栏功能可将这些二维坐标转化为房间占用情况。然而,信号强度随距离下降的过程复杂且混乱,不仅受到信号阻挡(如墙壁、设备、人员)的影响,还受到多重信号反射(即“多路径衰减”)的影响。最终结果是,定位精度通常在8到10米之间甚至更差——远远不足以判断设备位于哪个房间。机器学习 有机器学习背景的人可能会看到一个机会:判断设备位于哪个房间并不是一个追踪问题,而是一个分类问题。正如所有顿悟一样,这需要新一代的RTLS公司跳出传统算法的思维框架,以全新的视角来看待这个问题。正是在这里,人工智能正在彻底改变RTLS。如果我们可以利用第二类低成本技术实现第一类技术的性能水平呢?如果我们可以以低成本实现全部价值呢?通过结合BLE传感器并应用机器学习,人工智能正是带来了这样的成果。与其费尽周折地根据信号强度进行非常差的范围估算,不如将信号强度作为训练分类算法的特征。由于信号可以穿透多堵墙,一个标签可以接收到多个固定基础设施设备的信号,从而提供大量特征,用于对房间占用情况做出非常高置信度的判断。AI在安装时只需进行一次训练,学习足以区分房间1和房间2等特征。这是一种思维方式的根本转变,其结果深远。对于传统的Wi-Fi和BLE系统而言,建筑中的混乱信号传播会带来巨大的信号强度变化,从而使距离估算算法失效,导致精度极差。相反,这种从一个地方到另一个地方的信号强度变化,正是机器学习之所以强大的特征差异。那些摧毁传统方法的信号传播特征,正是你为AI提供“养分”的最佳来源。RTLS已经迈入一个新时代,借助运行在“云级别”大脑上的复杂机器学习算法,可以采用分类方法对物体位置进行判断。人工智能与RTLS的结合,带来了高性能且低成本的传感器,正在改善关键流程,使医院能够以更低的成本提供更好的服务并实现更好的结果。推文分享 邮件分享 医疗 基于AI的医疗设备追踪 室内定位
您觉得本篇内容如何
评分

评论

您需要登录才可以回复|注册

提交评论

广告

iotforall

这家伙很懒,什么描述也没留下

关注

点击进入下一篇

新浪潮 智慧消防展现新特点

提取码
复制提取码
点击跳转至百度网盘